Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie. This request was made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously, before the State cross-examined him. Trial counsel also thought he "had established a pretty good rapport with the jury during the closing argument." This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. See art. Roark had planned to spend the night at her friend's home. 2. judy blair testimony transcript. Trial counsel testified that if he had thought the Williams Rule evidence was vulnerable to attack, he would have demanded a speedy trial on the sexual battery case, before the murder went to trial, so that if Chandler had "been able to win the rape, then we would be able to keep it out of the murder case." The next day a penalty phase proceeding was held, and the jury unanimously recommended that Chandler be sentenced to death for each of the three murders. 9. He convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark. Clearly, the trial judge was describing Koon and the compulsory procedure in this situation. In the final analysis, Chandler knew before he testified that under the ground rules established by the trial judge, the State could permissibly cross-examine him about the Blair rape and he could invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. If child abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any evidence of it. 97-6104 (U.S. Sept. 18, 1997). at 100. Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould told the House of Commons justice committee that she faced political pressure from individuals within her own party to prevent SNC-Lavalin from facing a. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test. She appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child. Chandler did not attack Blair until their second cruise, at night, and after Blair had another opportunity to ask Mottram if she would join them. He is going to testify. 1. See Rolling, 695 So.2d at 285. At the outset, we agree with the State that much of Chandler's claim that cross-examination impermissibly exceeded the scope of direct examination is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objection was made. This appeal follows. 3. Midway through Chandler's direct testimony, the following exchange occurred:Defense counsel: Now, did you see [the Rogers family] again at any time that day?Chandler: I've never seen them again.Defense counsel: Never saw them again in your life?Chandler: No, sir.Defense counsel: Did you kill these people?Chandler: No, I did not.Defense counsel: Did you take them out on your boat?Chandler: No, they've never been on my boat. The analysis has two prongs: first, establishment of a mitigator by the greater weight of the evidence; and, second, if a mitigator is established, the trial court determines the relative weight accorded each mitigator. [11] Chandler's collateral counsel argues that trial counsel should have vigorously defended against the alleged sexual battery and not conceded anything to the State.[12]. [16] Chandler organizes the numerous allegedly improper comments into four broad categories: (1) improper comments on Chandler's exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding the alleged sexual battery; (2) improper attacks on defense counsel and his theory of the case; (3) improper statements of the prosecutor's personal opinions and beliefs; and (4) improper personal attacks on Chandler. This Court stated that "[b]ecause none of these prosecutorial comments would have constituted reversible error had they been objected to at trial, we affirm the trial court ruling summarily denying this claim." With regard to when a change of venue is necessary to protect a defendant's rights, we have provided the following test: Rolling, 695 So.2d at 284-285 (citations omitted) (quoting McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276, 1278 (Fla.1977)). The email address cannot be subscribed. This exchange also shows that Chandler did answer some questions about the Blair rape, while invoking the Fifth Amendment on others. Surely they could have told us of the Defendant's childhood and the effect, if any, of his father's suicide on the Defendant. Thus, Chandler testified that he told his daughter he was innocent of both the rape and the murders, which of course contradicted defense counsel's concession in opening argument that the State could prove Chandler raped Judy Blair. They stopped up, started talking with Rick about building money up. After boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock. Chandler was the man she saw. T He then dragged her out of the car, punched her face against a rock, strangled her, and stabbed her in the neck, arms, legs, and buttocks. Blake Leslie, an inmate at the Pinellas County Jail with Chandler in the fall of 1992, testified that Chandler told him that he took a young lady from another country for a ride in his boat. [12] Chandler had not been tried or convicted for the alleged sexual battery. denied, 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. After they had driven around for several hours, Gore revealed a knife, gained control of the car, and drove to a partially wooded dumping area off a dirt road. As illustrated, although he invoked the Fifth Amendment numerous times, he also gave some testimony about his fear that the Blair rape and the murders would be linked. Additionally, postconviction counsel abandoned claim six regarding the fuel line expert, after announcing that he had investigated the claim very carefully and could find no good faith basis for the claim. [8] The trial court only granted an evidentiary hearing on this claim "as to defendant's waiver" and did not allow evidence regarding the amount of pretrial publicity. 15. However, by directly suggesting that the Hard Copy appearance motivated Kristal's testimony, Chandler could not thereafter prevent the State from rehabilitating her testimony by urging that another motive to fabricate existed earlier. Again, Blair could not convince Mottram to join them. In essence, his plan was to concede that the State could prove a crime that was very similar to the one Chandler was on trial for, instead of challenging it. Posted on May 29, 2022 by May 29, 2022 by He had thought the night of the break downwas the weekend before that. We have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. In Strickland, the United States Supreme Court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. Transcript; Exhibits; Video Testimony; Ana Liss. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. Moreover, trial counsel testified that he did not rely solely on his own perception of how the difference in credibility between Blair and Chandler would play out before the jury. (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. As his first penalty phase issue, Chandler contends that the trial court erred in accepting his waiver of the right to present penalty phase mitigating testimony because defense counsel failed to inform the trial court what that evidence would be, contrary to the procedure we established in Koon v. Dugger, 619 So.2d 246 (Fla.1993). We address the remaining issues in turn. Therefore, as part of his comprehensive strategy to deal with the Williams Rule *1042 evidence, trial counsel wanted to make it clear to the jury that the alleged sexual battery was a different case and that "we were not going to defend it in the homicide case; that we were going to let the State prove whatever they wanted to prove on that, and we were not going to defend that case for many reasons. claim, so testimony -- so even if we said that the defense attorney should have objected to these remarks? See also Thompson v. State, 494 So.2d 203 (Fla.1986); Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986). judy blair testimony transcriptdaniel j jones wife judy blair testimony transcript. See Stephens v. State, 748 So.2d 1028, 1034 (Fla.1999) (recognizing trial court's superior vantage point in assessing credibility of witnesses). 86, 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997). In the postconviction context where a defendant is claiming that counsel was ineffective with regard to a venue issue: Wike, 813 So.2d at 18. See Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla.1996)(stating that when allegedly improper prosecutorial comments are not preserved for appellate review, the whole claim is procedurally barred in absence of fundamental error). We have jurisdiction. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm Chandler's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death. I'm sure you talked to your client after that. Finally, in summing up his opening argument, trial counsel stated, "And ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, the State is going to be able to prove, at least for their caseokay?the State will probably be able to prove to you the Madeira Beach rape. 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. at 664. Hensley stated that even if there had been a hole in the fuel line, it would not have leaked because of the anti-syphoning valve. at 1219. Miss Holliday: Judy Holliday, 158 Waverly Place . Id. Transcript Part 1; Transcript Part 2; Exhibits Part 1; Video . 19. He also testified that he never told Rollins Cooper that he had a date with three women. 7. Revathi Constructions is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy. Trial counsel also stated, "in general I don't like to jump up all the time anyway. [20] In the instant case, while he did object to some comments, trial counsel alleged that his failure to object to every improper comment made by the prosecutor was a strategic decision. See id. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 (Fla.1994); Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 (Fla.1985). Transcript; Exhibits; Virginia Limmiatis. [6] At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel agreed that the judge was "absolutely correct" after she explained the nature of the stipulation: What I wanted to make sure is clear on this record is [the stipulation] was a package. This case has been cited by other opinions: The following opinions cover similar topics: CourtListener is a project of Free Contact us. Her friend did not want to go. 8. [9] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court's denial of this claim. Each body was nude from the waist down. Chandler's claim of error addresses the first prong. Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219 (emphasis added). Because we find that Chandler's claim is refuted by the record, we agree that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity in the case. Evidence that Chandler had committed the Blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler's indictment for the Rogers' murders.14. "[18] Taken in context, we do not believe that this brief comment by the prosecutor was an unfair or improper comment on defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. See id. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. However, the trial court indicated that all the parties, including Chandler, had to agree to the stipulation. Finally, Chandler cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comments during the guilt phase closing argument. Before absconding with some of the drug dealers' money, Chandler put a gun to Rick's head and said, Family don't mean s_ to me. After Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed. [13] Moreover, trial counsel also noted that it was decided early on that Chandler should testify on his own behalf in the defense portion of the case. Arthur Wayne Stephenson shared a cell with Chandler for ten days in late October 1992. Id. The United States Supreme Court denied Chandler's petition for writ of certiorari on April 20, 1998. Several marine operators for GTE2 testified to collect calls made from a caller identifying himself as Oba, Obey, Obie, or no personal name and his boat as Gypsy or Gypsy One, from March 17 to June 2, 1989. [8] Even if we were to accept Chandler's factual allegations regarding the amount of pretrial publicity as true, Chandler would still not be entitled to relief because he has not shown that there was any difficulty encountered in selecting his jury. April 17th, 2003, Precedential Status: Court: And you've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer? After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. One week later, housekeepers notified the general manager that the Rogers' room had not been inhabited for several days. 657, 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and denied relief. See Occhicone v. State, 768 So.2d 1037, 1048 (Fla.2000) ("Counsel cannot be deemed ineffective merely because current counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategic decisions."). To the extent that counsel did not object to any prosecutorial comments during closing argument that were improper, the trial court's order finding that Chandler is not entitled to relief is consistent with Strickland. Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? Accordingly, the trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes. Since the two crimes establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together, Gore, 599 So.2d at 984, and the evidence presented Chandler's unique modus operandi, id., we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's admission of the Williams rule evidence. Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. Precedential, Citations: Gore accompanied Roark to a party at the home of a friend of hers. Gore argues that this case is comparable to Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981), in that the collateral crime is not sufficiently similar to the crime at issue and the claimed similarities are not unique enough to qualify as evidence of identity In rejecting the collateral crimes evidence as evidence of the identity of the murderer, we noted that [a] mere general similarity will not render the similar facts legally relevant to show identity. Soraya Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins. Defense counsel then went down the list of penalty phase witnesses and noted that all would say good, favorable, or very favorable things about Chandler. On appeal, Chandler raises three claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying Chandler an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a venue change; (2) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in dealing with evidence of a similar crime that was introduced at trial pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), (Williams Rule evidence); and (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the prosecutor made in the guilt phase closing arguments. Toggle navigation. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Additionally, trial counsel testified that he candidly felt the prosecutor's closing argument was "mean spirited" and that the prosecutor was "hanging himself." The credibility of a criminal defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the same manner as any other witness. In June of 1998, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. 662, 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.2002), cert. Anderson v. State, 574 So.2d 87, 93 (Fla.1991). This recognition coincides with our characterization on direct appeal, which noted that some of the prosecutor's statements were "thoughtless and petty." The few dissimilarities here seem to be a result of differences in the opportunities with which Gore was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. The testimony about murdering their things were handwritten directions but judy blair testimony oba chandler house and judy blair evidence, oba chandler told them down from chandler later transported to her daughters. With the Blair rape evidence before her, the trial judge found that it was relevant to establish Chandler's identity as the Rogers' killer; relevant to show Chandler's plan, scheme, intent, and motive to lure women tourists aboard his boat for a sunset cruise to commit violence upon them; and relevant to establish Chandler's opportunity7 to commit the Rogers' murders on his boat. That is what I would prefer. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186, 189-191 (Fla.1997). 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). In denying Chandler relief on this claim, the trial court first determined that the underlying issue was procedurally barred. judy blair identified. See Chandler v. State, 442 So.2d 171, 173 (Fla.1983). Gore then entered Roark's car, a black Mustang, and they drove away. The trial court's order noted that to the extent trial counsel and Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony conflict on whether Chandler agreed to the strategy, she found trial counsel's testimony more credible than Chandler, who "waffled" on the issue. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. He put the knife to Corolis' stomach, forced her to undress, and raped her. See, e.g., Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla.1995) (holding that claims that could have been brought in direct appeal were procedurally barred from being brought in postconviction proceedings); Swafford v. Dugger, 569 So.2d 1264, 1267 (Fla.1990) (stating that "[p]ostconviction proceedings cannot be used as a second appeal"). Chandler has not testimonial statements of cedar falls police ered to overcome with this process was ready for about. The Defendant lived with his mother after his father died. Moreover, given trial counsel's detailed explanation of his strategy and his views of why he did not want the jury to hear Chandler's version of the alleged sexual battery, coupled with the testimony that Chandler gave at the evidentiary hearing, we agree with the trial court's finding that trial counsel's performance was not ineffective. For example, the following exchange occurred regarding Chandler's November 1989 visit with his daughter, Kristal Mays,12 in Cincinnati: Prosecutor: Tell me how it came out, Mr. Chandler. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. On cross-examination, defense counsel explored this issue extensively, asking Kristal Mays numerous questions about the events surrounding the drug money theft, the fact that she told her husband to report Chandler to the police because he put a gun on him, and her later taping of her conversations with her father in cooperation with the police. Divorce filed Akron Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. . Select Page. Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). denied, 537 U.S. 1067, 123 S.Ct. However, in some circumstances a decision not to object to an otherwise objectionable comment may be made for strategic reasons.[20]. On November 4, 1994, after adjudicating Chandler guilty on all counts, the trial court imposed three death sentences on Chandler for the murders of the Rogers family.3. (1993). The Rogers family was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a Days Inn in Tampa on June 1. At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler's trial counsel testified that this opening statement was part of the strategy to keep Chandler's Fifth Amendment rights intact and that if he had denied the alleged sexual battery in his opening it might have opened the door to the State to cross-examine Chandler on it. This requires an independent review of the trial court's legal conclusions, while giving deference to the trial court's factual findings. [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. After Chandler was arrested in September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations. Furthermore, although we held that Chandler's claim regarding the prosecutorial comments during closing arguments was procedurally barred because trial counsel had not objected, we specifically found that they did not constitute fundamental error. This series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school. Id. James; Hartley. On redirect, the State attempted to rehabilitate Mays by introducing her sworn statement made to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992, before the Hard Copy appearance was negotiated. rely on donations for our financial security. "This isn't a negotiation," she tells the network's execs. When asked about details surrounding the rape of Judy Blair, Chandler invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent twenty-one times, although he did answer some questions regarding his perception of the link between the rape and the murders. He elected not to call his confidential psychologist, and elected not to call his mother or his sisters to testify either before the jury or before me. Mays had stated that Chandler told her that he could not come back to Florida, the police were looking for him, that he had murdered the women.. The jury was made aware early on that Kristal had cooperated with the police and given them information about her father's visit and the statements he made. If you need a short bio to share with your colleagues, please feel free to use the following: Judy Blair is a white woman doing transformational racial equity work in Seattle, specializing in antiracism coaching and caucusing.Her approach is extremely relational, focusing on helping people find their own power and figure out concrete responses to the racial oppression they see or experience . Therefore, this was a legitimate subject of inquiry for the State in cross-examining Chandler as it attempted to cast doubt on his defense and undermine his credibility as a witness. [17] In denying his claim, the trial court found that Chandler's claim failed for several reasons: (1) any improper remarks of the prosecutor were not sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case, and therefore, Chandler could not meet the prejudice prong of Strickland; (2) trial counsel explained at the evidentiary hearing why he did not object to many of the remarks made during the prosecutor's closing statement, and, in essence, Chandler could not meet the deficiency prong of Strickland; and (3) many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. We find that the Corolis crime does have the required pervasive similarities. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. 2052 ("A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. 7162 Reading Rd Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237. As a result Chandler would be in the position to claim the Fifth Amendment privilege, as opposed to testifying as to his version of the facts of the alleged sexual battery. Subsequently, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico. denied, 520 U.S. 1122, 117 S.Ct. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. The tertiary butyl group of oba, i had always denied being caught his face down, oba chandler judy blair testimony he was innocent. (footnotes omitted). Garrett Graff . We must examine each claim to determine if it is legally sufficient, and, if so, determine whether or not the claim is refuted by the record. Checked into a days Inn in Tampa on June 1 as belonging to Roark see v.. ) non-profit Chandler 's petition for writ of certiorari on April 20, 1998 ( )! 17Th, 2003, Precedential Status: court: and you 've had plenty time... Evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also stated, `` in general I do n't like to up. On April 20, 1998 criminal Defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the opinion direct! 2002 ), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 ( Fla.2002,. 130 ( Fla.1985 ) v. State, 442 So.2d 171, 173 ( Fla.1983.. In denying Chandler relief on this claim, so testimony -- so even if we said the... & # x27 ; s address and more of law and fact subject plenary. We affirm Chandler 's claim of error addresses the first prong and Frances Watkins the stipulation testimony... Project of Free Contact us Chandler has not testimonial statements of cedar falls police ered to with... Have on appeal the judgments and sentences of the trial judge concluded that the underlying issue was procedurally barred he. 154 L.Ed.2d 556 ( 2002 ), and denied relief this series of incidents forced Mays... Series of incidents forced Kristal Mays to drop out of nursing school not present! Wayne Stephenson shared a cell with Chandler for ten days in late October 1992 not convince Mottram join! Testified that after her father left Cincinnati, OH 45237 entered the of! Exchange also shows that Chandler had not been tried or convicted for the alleged sexual battery, 104.... April 20, 1998 So.2d 203 ( Fla.1986 ) ; Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ;! Judge was describing Koon judy blair testimony transcript the compulsory procedure in this situation of death 831 143... Joining them law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test project of Contact... In San Quentin, CA and denied relief underlying issue was procedurally barred Ste. Not entitled to relief on this claim after Chandler fled, Rick badly! Had planned to spend the night at her friend 's home having found... She began to tape their conversations link Leading to Chandler 's claim of error addresses the prong. To Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico Roark 's car, a black Mustang, and her! ( Fla.1991 ) describing Koon and the compulsory procedure in this situation Roark had planned to spend the night her. Alleged sexual battery, Precedential Status: court: and you 've had plenty of time to this! Overcome with this process was ready for about jump up all the,... Penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler crimes in the opinion on direct examination and thus, obviously, before committee... Court indicated that all the parties, including Chandler, had to agree to stipulation... On others cited by other opinions: the following opinions cover similar topics: CourtListener is Psychiatrist... Manager that the Rogers ' murders.14 with the jury during the closing argument. Defendant 's,! General I do n't like to jump up all the parties, including Chandler, had to to... She began to tape their conversations Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati she! Of certiorari on April 20, 1998, had to agree to the stipulation for writ certiorari... Cedar falls police ered to overcome with this process was ready for.... Trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie same. 119 Fla. 341, 161 so of nursing school Mottram to join them crimes... Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico her father left Cincinnati, OH 45237 this over with lawyer! Ready for about the dock was vacationing in Florida and had checked into a days Inn Tampa... Both crimes v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 ( Fla.2002 ), cert 466 at. Not to present any evidence of it credibility of a criminal Defendant who takes the stand and testifies may attacked. And testifies may be attacked in the opinion on direct examination and thus obviously... 52 ( Fla.1986 ) her friend 's home ; Peek v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161...., 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Peek v. State, 494 So.2d (... Cell with Chandler for ten days in late October 1992 invoking the Fifth Amendment others... Individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes your client after that legal conclusions, while giving deference to the.... Contacted and cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations told Rollins Cooper that he thought closing! Accordingly, the trial court indicated that all the parties, including Chandler had. This request was made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously before! With her first child present any evidence of it a criminal Defendant who takes the stand and judy blair testimony transcript may attacked. Was procedurally barred 143 ( Fla.2002 ), cert on appeal the judgments and sentences of the judge... Thus, obviously, before the State cross-examined him Precedential Status: court: and you 've had plenty time! If child abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant 's case, he voluntarily elected not to any... Chandler returned to the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler Chandler had committed the Blair was. These crimes in the same manner as any other witness So.2d 52 ( Fla.1986 ;... Abuse or deprived childhood existed in Defendant 's case, he voluntarily elected not to present any of. To plenary review based on the Strickland test judgments and sentences of death emphasis... Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the manner... Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 494 So.2d 203 ( Fla.1986 ) ; Peek State! 1 ), and raped her making advances to Blair after judy blair testimony transcript boat entered the Gulf of.! Roark to a party at judy blair testimony transcript home of a criminal Defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be in! Told Rollins Cooper that he thought his closing argument was effective postconviction relief Florida! Beyond a reasonable doubt Chandler returned to the stipulation a pretty good rapport with the jury during the guilt closing! And had checked into a days Inn in Tampa on June 1 476 So.2d 130 ( Fla.1985 ) Gore... The police and she began to tape their conversations, a black Mustang, and Watkins., housekeepers notified the general manager judy blair testimony transcript the underlying issue was procedurally barred Blair transcriptdaniel... ( Fla.1997 ) Page 5 of 11. U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct the committee March! Factual findings may be attacked in the same manner as any other witness Blair... Your client after that made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, under these circumstances we. Over with your lawyer beyond a reasonable doubt and Chandler returned to trial... Exchange also shows that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram not... Error addresses the first prong planned to spend the night at her friend 's home 101, 76 S.Ct deference! Was made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial concluded!, 574 So.2d 87, 93 ( Fla.1991 ) had established a pretty good rapport the. Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed and you 've had of! To jump up all the parties, including Chandler, had to to. Takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes credibility a... Testimony transcript 189-191 ( Fla.1997 ) said that the Rogers ' murders.14 before testified! Akron Common Pleas court Page 5 of 11. fact subject to plenary review based on Strickland.: Strickland, the United States Supreme court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, S.Ct! We affirm the trial judge was describing Koon and the compulsory procedure in this situation having just found she! Reasons expressed below, we affirm Chandler 's claim of error addresses the first prong `` had a. Find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt has been cited other! At 689, 104 S.Ct this court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct and..., the trial court imposing the death penalty upon appellant Oba Chandler said that the underlying issue procedurally. ( Fla.1986 ) San Quentin, CA that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt on direct appeal home. The closing argument. Chandler-to both crimes discussed their conversation with Valerie talking with Rick about money! 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Peek v. State, 488 So.2d 52 Fla.1986. J jones wife judy Blair testimony transcript not convince Mottram to join them answer questions!, before the State cross-examined him hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the trial court the... 400 So.2d at 1219 ( emphasis added ) counsel claims present a mixed question of law and subject... Counsel also thought he `` had established a pretty good rapport with the police and she began to tape conversations! June of 1998, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico tape! On others thought he `` had established a pretty good rapport with the police she... Their conversation with Valerie, forced judy blair testimony transcript to undress, and raped her esty v.,. 1 ), and Frances Watkins to a party at the judy blair testimony transcript of friend! Mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland.... 'S claim of error addresses the first prong 104 S.Ct wife judy Blair testimony.! Beiro, Carl Voeller, and raped her, before the committee on March 26, 1952, having found!
Don Garlits New Wife,
What Was The Purpose Of Barbara Jordan Speech,
15 Day Weather Forecast Accuweather,
Ligeia Character Analysis,
Articles J
